Money is a major tool in COIN operations. Many leaders liken it to a weapon, a force multiplier. Funding from sources such as the Commander's Emergency Response Program (CERP) can help commanders build rapport with the local community and create a stable and secure environment.
However, there is also concern about the ramifications of the use of money on the battlefield. A May 2008 article in the Economist stated,
"...instant projects are not sustainable...the aim must be to create long-term development and build up the capacity of Afghans to run their own affairs. At best CERP provides "artificial resuscitation" rather than real treatment; at worst, as when schools are built without teachers to staff them, the Americans end up constructing what one British official called “the world’s most expensive camel sheds."
A COIN Center Blog visitor commented, "The use of CERP funds, while positive for keeping young males occupied, does not necessarily create the conditions for Afghan self sustainability. CERP funds could become just another form of welfare, which discourages economic initiative."
What role should money play in COIN? What can be done to ensure that funding programs, such as CERP, enhance mission accomplishment rather than detract from it?
The COIN Center is interested in your perspectives and experiences in the application of money (best practices, lessons learned, examples of how money was utilized effectively/ineffectively) in theater. We look forward to your responses.
For further information on this topic please reference the "Money as a Weapon System (MAAWS) SOP" located in our Knowledge Center.